Mojo
mo·jo noun \ˈmō-(ˌ)jō\
: a power that may seem magical and that allows someone to be very effective, successful, etc.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mojo
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mojo
Your Assumption
Who are YOU ?
Status & Standing
Whether the practice of law is a “right” or a “privilege” need not here be determined; it is not a matter of the State’s grace.
P 353 U.S. 239 n5. Supreme Court v. Arhens
“The practice of law is an occupation of common right”
Sims V. Ahrens
And upheld that “they[attorneys] cannot represent any private citizen nor any business as the state cannot license the practice of law” as per the ruling of the supreme court in Schware v. Board of Examiners. 353U.S. 238 .239
The only statutes found for the “unauthorized practice of law” dealt with such issues as “A lawyer shall not aid a non-lawyer in the unauthorized practice of law” or “practice law in a jurisdiction where to do so would be in violation of the regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction.”
“Congress, in enacting the Administrative Procedure Act , refused to limit the right to practice before the administration agencies lawyers.”
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973)
"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239.
"The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."
Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925)
"The practice of law is an occupation of common right."
***
Those first three mean anything, anymore? If so, why do i need a licence?
Miller v. U.S., 230 F. 2d. 486, 490; 42
"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one, because of his exercise of constitutional rights."
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105
"No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore."
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262
"If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity."
United States Constitution, First Amendment
Right to Petition; Freedom of Association.
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425
Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972)
"Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
And the U.S Supreme court said so!
CIVIL: (I Think)
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905
"... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend"
A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Man of Many Hats -
Who are you interfacing with ?
Jurisdiction
No Judges
Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public laws-common law of the republics’ -- or that system of law that was controlled by de jure National American common law Constitutional limitations Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. (41 US 1) 1842 . Was replaced with Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64,1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed defacto Equity martial law code rule and martial law code statutes of public D.C. policy from 1939 on..
Judge v Administrator
The Court... The Court of YOU
The Court of them
Presumption
Consent
Claim - Claimant - Injured Party
Remedy
Perfecting a Security Interest
| the_law_legal_maxums.pdf |
| seven_elements_of_jurisdiction.docx |
| presumption.pdf |
| precident_judge__attorney_cannot_testify.pdf |
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or
usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be
subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiciont
thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress . . . .
************************************************************************************************
The Statutes at Large prevails over the Code when the two are inconsistent. Schwier v. Cox,
340 F.3d 1284, 1288 (11th Cir. 2003) (citing Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426 (1943);
United States v. Welden, 377 U.S. 95, 98 n.4 (1964)).
************************************************************************************************
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
********************************************************************************************************************
Note: The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that any judge who acts without jurisdiction is engaged in an act of treason. U.S. v. Will 499 US 200, 216, S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821).
********************************************************************************************************************
18 USC 4 “Misprision of Felony” refusing to prosecute felony crime.
18 USC 8 “Bank Bonds” is “Currency”
18 USC 514 “Fictitious Obligation” prohibited
18 USC 2113 “Bank Robbery” commercial or private
18 USC 241 Conspiracy against rights
18 USC 891-894 Extortionate Credit Transactions
18 USC 1961 Definitions of “Racketeering Activities”
18 USC 1951 Interference with commerce
18 USC 1001 Fraud
18 USC 1341 “Mail Fraud”
18 USC 1343 “Wire Fraud”
18 USC 1344 “Bank Fraud”
18 USC 2381 “Treason”
18 USC 2382 “Misprision of Treason”
5 USC 556(d), 557 and 706 once due process is denied all jurisdiction ceases.
5 USC 557(c) (3) Findings of Facts and conclusions of law required for all decisions.
10 USC 333 Interference with federal or state law
15 USC 1692a-n “Fair Debt Collection Act”
22 USC 611 “Foreign Agents” of “Foreign Principals”
28 USC 1333 “Admiralty Jurisdiction”
28 USC 372 “Oaths of Judges”
28 USC 33 Federal Bureau of Investigation “Limits and restrictions”.
31 USC 5118 Commercial Instrument are legal tender for payment of debt.
31 USC 3123 Payment of obligation and interest on Public Debt.
31 USC 5103 Commercial instrument is legal tender
31 USC 5118 D2 No Demandant for money can specific a particular specie of money he wishes to be payed in.
42 USC 1981 “Equal Rights under the law”.
42 USC 1983 “Civil Rights Violations”
46 USC 781 “Public Vessels Act” HJR 192 “Act of Congress” “Corporate Congress” Banks can not refuse currency.
27 CFR 72.11 - All Crimes are Commercial
UCC = Uniform Commercial Codes, These regulate all financial institutions engaged in commerce.
UCC3-503 “Dishonor of Commercial Instruments”
UCC3-603 “Full payment refuse, debt is paid in full”.
UCC4-105(1)Bank means a person engaged in the business of banking
UCC9-105 “Records” authenticated, identifiable, and unalterable.
************************************************************************************************************************
Article XI.The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
************************************************************************************************************************
Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People– Supreme Court of the United States 1795"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),
***********************************************************************************************************************
"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness".(Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647)
Subject: Trinsey v Pagliaro, 229 F.Supp. 647: when you read it you will find that it is THE case cited for FRCivP 12(b) (6).
***********************************************************************************************************************
Porter v. Porter (N.D. 1979 ) 274 N.W.2d 235 ñ The practice of an attorney filing an affidavit on behalf of his client asserting the status of that client is not approved, inasmuch as not only does the affidavit become hearsay, but it places the attorney in a position of witness thus compromising his role as advocate.
***********************************************************************************************************************
Frunzar v. Allied Property and Casualty Ins. Co. (Iowa 1996)† 548 N.W.2d 880 Professional statements of litigants attorney are treated as affidavits, and attorney making statements may be cross-examined regarding substance of statement. [And, how many of those Ass-Holes have "first hand knowledge"?
***********************************************************************************************************************
Bond:
A bond is for one purpose to insure your appearance in court. Tell the judge my word is my bond I will appear. I will not allow you to extort money on my word. Any amount you demand of me to retain my freedom is extortion. I state for the Record My word is my Bond and I will appear.
***********************************************************************************************************************
Challenges to Judge: Universal to all cases.
A judge who refuses our law is loyal to some other authority. Ask the “Judge” if he/she is a member of the “STATE BAR ASSOCIATION”. If so, challenge the “Judge” under 22 USC 611 as a “Foreign Agent”. All “Judges” are lawfully required by 28 USC 372 to have an “Oath of Office”. Ask the “Judge” if he/she has an “Oath of Office”. If yes, accept the “Oath of Office” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction”. Now the “Judge” is subject to criminal prosecution and civil litigation for any injury he/she may cause you. If no, the attorney is not a judge and has no lawful authority to proceed. Your State Representative should be informed by “Petition for Impeachment of Judge”. Present the facts of the case, the law is not necessary. Have it notarized and send it by Certified Mail. As we remove the unlawful judges, lawful judges will take their place.
**********************************************************************************************************************
Civil Actions:
Most of the cases filed as civil actions are “Fraud” of attorneys claiming a “Corporation” has rights, privileges and immunities in court, common knowledge dictates a Corporation is an artificial person without natural rights. For an attorney to file a civil action with a “Corporation” as “Plaintiff” is clear “Fraud on the Court”. A “Corporation” cannot sign a “Power of Attorney” or give any attorney verbal instructions to act on its behalf. Therefore, no attorney can lawfully represent any “Corporation in court”.
**********************************************************************************************************************
Lawful Challenge:
Demand the “Plaintiff” appear. Because the 6th Amendment secures that no person will be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Therefore, the “Plaintiff” must appear and state he/she is owed a debt, the debtor must be given the right to challenge this debt for “validation” 15 USC 1692g. Only an “injured party” can claim a debt is owed. “Imaginary persons” can not appear or give testimony and can not be the “Plaintiff” of any cause of action. Challenge the attorney as a “Foreign Agent” 22 USC 611 acting for a “Foreign State” (Corporation) who has commence action in violation of the 11th Amendment. Demand dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
***********************************************************************************************************************
Principles of Law:
The people have rights, Corporations do not have rights. Among these “Rights” is the right to contract, the people have this right under 42 USC 1981. The people exercise this right by their signature and/or Social Security Number. Corporations can not sign and therefore can not enter into any contract, with any attorney. The right to contract is reserved to the people. This is established by the age old principle of “Agency”. To establish an “Agency”, the “Principal” must ask the “Agent” to perform a task. The “Agent” must agree to perform the task. It is a time tested principle, of “American Jurisprudence” that the “Court” must not rely upon the “Agent” to prove “Agency”. The “Court” must follow the “Principal” to establish “Agency”. The law is simple no “Principal” no “Agency” no “Capacity to Sue”. Case must be dismissed.
***********************************************************************************************************************
There are many “Organized Crime Operations” being conduct in the “Corporate Courts” of the “UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT”. There are two classifications of courts in the “United States of America”, these are, “…one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” According to Article III, Section 1 of the “Constitution for the united States of America”. Since the “Civil War” these “Courts” have been operated as “Corporate Courts” for the profit of attorneys, who engage in the business of “Organized Crime” in these courts. Some of these are as follows:
Foreclosure Proceedings:
This has become a “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 of judges, attorneys and banks to steal private property under the color of law. “Foreclosure” is noting more than intimidation, threats and coercion of a person to forfeit their private property to an attorney and the judge who sell it to a bank for profit. “Foreclosure Sale” is the attorney selling your private property, usually to a bank by sealed bid at a fraction of the value of the property, without proof of ownership. Then the attorney acts on behalf of the “Corporation” to commence and enforce “Eviction” by force of arms of the police, sheriff, deputy or federal marshal. This is the widest spread “Organized Crime of Extortion” in American History. The following is the method to defeat this criminal conduct.
1. Dispute the Debt.
The Attorneys’ first step is usually to send you notice of foreclosure, giving you 30 days to “dispute” this debt. The answer is simple, dispute the debt.
Method of Disputing Debt
Send a business letter to the judge, attorney and mortgage company, by Certified Mail, stating as follows:
“I dispute this debt, I dispute all claims of contract 15 USC 1692g.”
Note: 15 USC 1692a-n, known as the “Fair Debt Collection Act” says what “Debt Collectors” can and can not do in the process of collecting a debt. You should copy this for your information.
2. If you go to Court:
a. Challenge “Agency” of attorney with “Plaintiff”. Challenge Attorney’s “Capacity to sue” for a corporation. As outlined above.
b. Demand the attorney produce the “Original Note” for return by the judge if “Foreclosure” is granted. The “Plaintiff” can not keep the “Note” and take the property, it is lawfully required to give up one or the other. Tell the court you will keep the property until the “Original Note” is produced.
c. Should the judge refuse to comply with the law, place a 2 cent postage stamp on the back of his order in the lower right hand corner, of each and every page, and sign your name across it. This establishes any further action by the judge is “Mail Fraud” 18 USC 1341. This crime should be reported to the postal inspector for investigation and prosecution.
Note: Every “Foreclosure” can be beat by this simple method. When a corporation receives a “Promissory Note” signed by you they deposit it and receive the amount plus additional money for the purchase of their contract, by the Federal Reserve Bank. The “Promissory Note” once “monetized” is removed from circulation and cannot be enforced. Therefore a copy of your note is not admissible, only the “original” will do to establish right to property. Demand it, it is your right to its return if “Foreclosure” is granted.
************************************************************************************************************************
Tax Collection:
Another, favorite “Organized Crime Operation” of attorneys and judges is “Tax Collection”. In this scam, the United States Attorney acts in “Fraud” to claim the “IRS” is government and fraudulently claims a debt is owed to government under Title 26 of the United States Codes. But the “IRS” is not government, it is a “For Profit Corporation”. Therefore, it must be dealt with like any other “Debt Collector” under Title 15, specifically 15 USC 1692a-n, commonly referred to as the “Fair Debt Collection Act”.
Step One:
Dispute all debts in writing. By answering the claim and placing it in dispute, the IRS is required to prove their claim in court. 15 USC 1692g. (Dispute as above)
Step Two:
Challenge the IRS Agent to prove he is a government official. False or misleading statements by a “Debt Collector” is prohibited 15 USC 1692e. This establishes the crime of “Fraud” 18 USC 1001 by the IRS Agent. Demand the Agent produce the contract you signed with him. When he cannot; no contract is present; no jurisdiction for the court can be established.
Step Three:
“Validate” the debt. The IRS Agent always claims you owe this debt. So make them prove their claim. Demand the IRS Agent, produce the physical human being who “assessed” your taxes. They have not produced one to date. By not being able to produce the person who assessed your taxes, they can not validate the debt because it cannot be proven correct or incorrect by cross examination. Demand a dismissal of all claims.
Step Four:
If a debt cannot be validated, there can be no collection of it. This is established by 15 USC 1692g(b). Disputed Debts a debt collector must cease collection of the debt until it is validated.
Step Five:
Challenge attorney for “Agency” with IRS as outlined above.
Step Six:
Challenge Judge for “jurisdiction” without a lawful claim as outlined above.
*************************************************************************************************************************
Dealing with Law Enforcement:
When a “Debt Collector” comes to steal your property. Call the police. Ask the officer to get the copy of the “Judgment” signed by the judge. If none is present, ask the officer to remove the “trespassers” from your property.
If a “Judgment” is presented turn it over and put a 2 cent postage stamp on the back lower right hand corner of every page and sign across the stamps. Hand it back to the officer and tell him this document is “Mail Fraud” 18 USC 1341 a felony crime and you want the officer to return it to the judge for investigation. The document lawfully challenged cannot be enforced. Ask the Officer to identify all persons present by proper identification for possible prosecution. Then ask the Officer to remove these criminals from your property.
Police Officers protect rights, if you express your rights, they must enforce them.
************************************************************************************************************************
All Debt Collectors:
Corporations of all kinds fall into the classification of “Debt Collectors”. If a “Corporation” is attempting to collect money from you, it is a “Debt Collector” and must act within the “Fair Debt Collection Act” 15 USC 1692 a-n. Whether it be a credit card company, auto finance company, loan company, bank, mortgage company or other lending institution all are accountable to law. When you understand the principles of law you can not be defeated by lies of what is or is not law spouted by incompetent attorneys who are ignorant of law by law. Article I, Section 10 prohibits “Titles of Nobility”, issued by states. All attorneys have unlawfully accepted the title of “Esquire”. Thus they are clearly incompetent in law and should not be relied upon as a source of legal advice. Their acceptance of a “British Atoned Registry”(BAR) “Title of Nobility” establish their loyalty to the crown, challenge them as “Foreign Agents” 22 USC 611.
************************************************************************************************************************
Principles of Law to remember:
1. No attorney can appear in court without the physical human being he represents. “Agents can not testify for principals.” Challenge every witness to prove they are the principal, by asking for their Driver’s Licenses, proving they are the “principal” i.e. “BANK OF AMERICA”. If they are not, demand their testimony be removed from the record as “Hearsay” testimony. An imaginary person cannot appear; no agent can speak for them. All agents are defeated by this process.
2. No “Debt Collector” can collect any debt without the “Original Wet Ink Signed Contract” being present in court. Copies are not admissible, object to them as forgeries. I don’t remember this contract my signature could have been copied from anywhere. This contract is the “subject matter” of the “Court’s jurisdiction”. Without it the court has no jurisdiction to proceed. The court must dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
3. If a judge refuses your lawful demands, challenge him as a last result as outlined above. Then send a “Petition for Impeachment of Judge ***” to your state representative and demand his removal from “Public Office”. In this manner all, in court become accountable for their conduct.
In the words of the great “Robert Fox” when you go to court you have two options, accept what the judge says without controversy and suffer the consequences or fight for your rights. I believe we have just “gone along” for far too long, I say challenge every case no matter how small.
By bringing your claim as yourself the man/woman (“sui juris” NOT “pro se”), you are competent and must be respected by your public servants. Their failure to act properly is grounds for their removal from public office. When you hire an attorney, you declare yourself incompetent and in need of court direction. You are a ward of the court. I can speak for myself and so can you. With a basic understanding and your refusal to let those issues slide, the court is forced to act in your interest. Failure to do so establishes a “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241by the judge and attorney to deny you your rights in court. Contact the US Attorney’s Office and file a “Criminal Complaint”. If they refuse, jurisdiction is established for “JAG” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction” 28 USC 1333. File your complaint with the Judge Advocate General’s Office in Washington.
************************************************************************************************************************
From here you start your own quest for knowledge. Everything you learn, know and can communicate is yours for your lifetime and those you share it with. Educate the young, because they will need it. Teach a friend and help him understand. When you speak our law do it with conviction, because you speak for all the people against injustice. When we all stand together in knowledge there will be no controversy, we can not over come..
When they perjure their oaths, go after their bonds. If they have no bond, go after everything they own. Without a bond, they are GUILTY of a theft of public funds! If they are ever going to repent, they must be brought to their knees! Before there can be mercy, there must be repentance!
*************************************************************************************************************************
The compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no thought of doing so ...” ...the act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled “REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON,” WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc.” PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409 (Dec.22, 1960).
RCWs are constitutionally defective, for the following reasons:
1. The Revised Code of Washington Makes No Claim To Be Law2. The Revised Code of Washington Specifically Disclaims Authority of Law"...Nothing herein shall be construed as changing the meaning of any such laws." RCW 1.04.021
3. The Washington State Supreme Court Has Said It Is Not The Law
“In this respect, the 1951 legislature was following its own unconstitutional device for amending a section of an act in disregard of the specific constitutional mandate. The act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled "Revised Code of Washington," which is not the law. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged." PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.2d 409, 415, (1960) (emphasis added)
4. It Claims Authority Only By The Unratified 1889 Constitution5. This “Code of Washington†Is Unlawfully Revised By The Executive Branch6. The Revised Code of Washington is Copyrighted And Therefore Private7. The Revised Code of Washington Has No Enacting Clauses8. The Revised Code of Washington Lacks Proper Titles
RCW’s do not apply to me, they do apply to you.
***********************************************************************************************************************
STATUTES REPLACED WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW CIRCA 1933
December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.
***********************************************************************************************************************
501(c)(5) — Labor, Agricultural, and Horticultural Organizations
WHFIT
WHFIT reporting rules in § 1.671-5
The official definition of a WHFIT, from an Internal Revenue notice (Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-40, Notice 2008-77) follows:
A WHFIT is an arrangement classified as a trust under • 301.7701-4(c), provided that: (i) the trust is a United States person under • 7701(a)(30)(E); (ii) the beneficial owners of the trust are treated as owners under subpart E, part I, subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code; and (iii) at least one interest in the trust is held by a middleman. See • 1.671-5(b)(22). A WHMT is a WHFIT the assets of which consist only of mortgages, regular interests in a REMIC, interests in another WHMT, reasonably required reserve funds, amounts received with respect to these assets, and during a brief initial funding period, cash and short-term contracts to purchase these assets. See • 1.671-5(b)(23).
42:38 so when you're standing as the authorized representative for the fungible agricultural commodity producing in a non mortgage widely held fixed investment trust, you have the right to safe harbor..middle man.
80:48 the principal founding of our vision of the WHFIT its called a commercial intercourse. Fungible agricultural commercial intercourse interexchange means that you will give them the credit and they will give you the receipts or [interference] audit the investigation.
Code to use WHIFT
Title 26 writen backwards
31 USC 5118 D2
No Demandant for money can specific a particular specie of money he wishes to be payed in.
All commercial instruments such as promissory notes, credit ... *
This is necessary because contracts requiring lawful money are illegal pursuant to Title 31 USC §5118(d) (2). All debts today are discharged by promises to pay in ...http://moneyonaccount.com/downloads/RedemptionByMethod/Counterclaims%20to%20Debt%20Collection%20%20August%202008.docx
See UCC 3-603(b).
(b) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an indorser or accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates.
As to HJR 192:
Also, HJR 192 was repealed on Sept. 13, 1982. You can find evidence of
this by looking up a schedule of laws repealed for this date at the
law library. If you don’t know how to find it, ask the people working
there. Even though it was repealed, it was “replaced” by other laws.
Do a U.S. Code search and look up Title 31 Sec. 5118. But more importantly look up Title 31 Sec 3123 then Title 18 Sec. 8 then Title
31 Sec. 3111. 31 Sec. 3123 explains that the U.S. is pledged to pay obligations of the U.S. 18 sec. 8 defines what obligations are. 31 sec
3111 explains how to do it.
This is the actual law regarding your statement. Laws made Pursuant to:
United States of America Congressional Acts
Nullifies Obligee power to require a particular type or coin or currency in the discharge of debts
HJR-192, Public Law 73-10 and Title 31 USC 5118 prohibits Banks/creditors from demanding any specific specie of payment. All Banks must process lawful United States currency. Failure to do so is “interference with commerce”, a felony under the RICO ACT, 18 USC 1951.
Guaranty Trust Company vs. Henwood, 307 U.S. 247 (1939
***********************************************************************************************************************
§ 3-415. OBLIGATION OF INDORSER.
(a) Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d) and to Section 3-419(d), if an instrument is dishonored, an indorser is obliged to pay the amount due on the instrument (i) according to the terms of the instrument at the time it was indorsed, or (ii) if the indorser indorsed an incomplete instrument, according to its terms when completed, to the extent stated in Sections 3-115 and 3-407. The obligation of the indorser is owed to a person entitled to enforce the instrument or to a subsequent indorser who paid the instrument under this section.
(b) If an indorsement states that it is made "without recourse" or otherwise disclaims liability of the indorser, the indorser is not liable under subsection (a) to pay the instrument.
(c) If notice of dishonor of an instrument is required by Section 3-503 and notice of dishonor complying with that section is not given to an indorser, the liability of the indorser under subsection (a) is discharged.
(d) If a draft is accepted by a bank after an indorsement is made, the liability of the indorser under subsection (a) is discharged.
(e) If an indorser of a check is liable under subsection (a) and the check is not presented for payment, or given to a depositary bank for collection, within 30 days after the day the indorsement was made, the liability of the indorser under subsection (a) is discharged.
**********************************************************************************************************************
11th amendment
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
**********************************************************************************************************************