A. Status and Standing
Knowing who you are and how to convey this to others is one of the most importing things you can know. In comprehending the "Law is Contract, Contract is Law" secret.
Status and Standing MUST be crystal clear in your mind.
For the purpose of you interfacing with your (public) servants, (and most other parties) we are taking the position of the De jure.
Status and Standing MUST be crystal clear in your mind.
For the purpose of you interfacing with your (public) servants, (and most other parties) we are taking the position of the De jure.
First let's be clear on what Status and Standing really means. To give us some indication we will look at Blacks Law Dictionary, 1st edition, page 1264.
STATUS; Standing; state or condition; social position. The legal relation of an individual to (the) rest of the community. The rights, duties, capacities and incapacities which determine a person to a given class. A legal personal relationship, not temporary in it's nature nor terminal at the mere will of the parties, with which third persons and the state are concerned.
Holzer v. Deutsche Reichsbahn Gesellschaft, 159 Misc. 830, 290 N.Y.S. 181, 191.
While term implies relation, it is not a mere relation.
STATUS; Standing; state or condition; social position. The legal relation of an individual to (the) rest of the community. The rights, duties, capacities and incapacities which determine a person to a given class. A legal personal relationship, not temporary in it's nature nor terminal at the mere will of the parties, with which third persons and the state are concerned.
Holzer v. Deutsche Reichsbahn Gesellschaft, 159 Misc. 830, 290 N.Y.S. 181, 191.
While term implies relation, it is not a mere relation.
This is from Blacks 2nd Edition
Ultimately your Status is determined by you and only you. It can be anything you please in any given situation and you can change and update your Standing at any time to suit your needs. This is the power of the De jure.
In the past you have allowed the de facto courts to presume your Status. They always presume the Status about you that suits their needs not yours. Revoke their presumptive powers in the beginning as you address them. Take charge and allow the court to make no decision about you. In some instances, even if you agree with the decision, object to it and then rephrase in your language and issue the order.
B. Are You a De Jure ?
Now lets have a look at the word "De jure".
From Blacks Law Dictionary, 1st edition, page 382
01 - De jure; Descriptive of a condition in which there has been total compliance with all the requirements of law. Of right; legitimate; lawful; by right and just title, in this sense it is contrary of de facto (q.v.). It may also be contrasted with de gratia, in which case it means "as matter of right" as de gratia means "by grace or favor." Again it may be contrasted with de aequitate; here meaning "by law," as the latter means "by equity."
You and I can be and are more than one thing at once. Therefore multiple titles may be held.
(Yes, a man can wear more than one hat at a time)
The de jure is the on the private side (however the de jure rules both the Public and the Private). And of all the private side Status's their can be, it is the highest and it is important to specifiy instead of only saying "this is on the private side". More about the Public side and the Private side later.
You can be for example a De jure Private Banker if you wanted to be.
(Yes, a man can wear more than one hat at a time)
The de jure is the on the private side (however the de jure rules both the Public and the Private). And of all the private side Status's their can be, it is the highest and it is important to specifiy instead of only saying "this is on the private side". More about the Public side and the Private side later.
You can be for example a De jure Private Banker if you wanted to be.
C. Are you a Sovereign ?
Sovereignty remains with the People it is not something a political body can be alone. The political state does not have ultimate sovereign power for that power is only on loan from the de jure people. The very moment that state engages in a harmful act against its de jure creators, the states borrowed powers dissolve.
SOVEREIGN. A person, body, or state in which independent and supreme authority is vested; a
chief ruler with supreme power; a king or other ruler with limited power.
BLD 4th Ed
Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356. “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies for government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.”
Carter v Carter Coal, 298 US 238. “And the Constitution itself is, in every real sense a law- the lawmakers being the people themselves, in whom, under our system, all political power and sovereignty primarily resides and through whom such power and sovereignty primarily speaks.”
U.S. v Lee, 106 US 196. “Under our system the people, who are there called subjects, are sovereign.”
Schlesinger v Reservists Committee to Stop the War, 418 US 208, 232-3. “We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people, not the bureaucracy, are sovereign. … Executives, lawmakers, and members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime.”
Afroyim v Rusk, 387 US 253; 87 S.Ct. 1660. “In our country the people are sovereign and the Government cannot sever its relationship to the people by taking away their citizenship. Our Constitution governs us and we must never forget that our Constitution limits the Government to those powers specifically granted or those that are necessary and proper to carry out the specifically granted ones.”
Seminole Tribe v Florida, 517 US 44, 153. (Souter dissenting) “When individuals sued States to enforce federal rights, the Government that corresponded to the ‘sovereign’ in the traditional common law sense was not the State but the National Government, and any state immunity from the jurisdiction of the Nation’s courts would have required a grant from the true sovereign, the people, in their Constitution, or from the Congress that the Constitution had empowered.”
Terry v State of Ohio, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1889). (Justice Douglas commenting upon police powers said:) “Yet if the individual is no longer to be sovereign, if the police can pick him up whenever they do not like the cut of his jib, if they can ‘seize’ and ‘search’ him in their discretion, we enter a new regime.”
West Coast Hotel Co. v Parrish, 300 US 379. (Sutherland dissenting) “Constitutions can not be changed by events alone. They remain binding as the acts of the people in their sovereign capacity, as the framers of Government, until they are amended or abrogated by the action prescribed by the authority which created them.”
Hale v Henkel, 201 US 243. “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a Citizen. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.”
United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258. “There is an old and well-known rule that statutes which in general terms divest pre-existing rights or privileges will not be applied to the sovereign without express words to that effect.”
Carter v Carter Coal, 298 US 238. “And the Constitution itself is, in every real sense a law- the lawmakers being the people themselves, in whom, under our system, all political power and sovereignty primarily resides and through whom such power and sovereignty primarily speaks.”
U.S. v Lee, 106 US 196. “Under our system the people, who are there called subjects, are sovereign.”
Schlesinger v Reservists Committee to Stop the War, 418 US 208, 232-3. “We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people, not the bureaucracy, are sovereign. … Executives, lawmakers, and members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime.”
Afroyim v Rusk, 387 US 253; 87 S.Ct. 1660. “In our country the people are sovereign and the Government cannot sever its relationship to the people by taking away their citizenship. Our Constitution governs us and we must never forget that our Constitution limits the Government to those powers specifically granted or those that are necessary and proper to carry out the specifically granted ones.”
Seminole Tribe v Florida, 517 US 44, 153. (Souter dissenting) “When individuals sued States to enforce federal rights, the Government that corresponded to the ‘sovereign’ in the traditional common law sense was not the State but the National Government, and any state immunity from the jurisdiction of the Nation’s courts would have required a grant from the true sovereign, the people, in their Constitution, or from the Congress that the Constitution had empowered.”
Terry v State of Ohio, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1889). (Justice Douglas commenting upon police powers said:) “Yet if the individual is no longer to be sovereign, if the police can pick him up whenever they do not like the cut of his jib, if they can ‘seize’ and ‘search’ him in their discretion, we enter a new regime.”
West Coast Hotel Co. v Parrish, 300 US 379. (Sutherland dissenting) “Constitutions can not be changed by events alone. They remain binding as the acts of the people in their sovereign capacity, as the framers of Government, until they are amended or abrogated by the action prescribed by the authority which created them.”
Hale v Henkel, 201 US 243. “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a Citizen. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.”
United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258. “There is an old and well-known rule that statutes which in general terms divest pre-existing rights or privileges will not be applied to the sovereign without express words to that effect.”
D. Are you Dei Gratia ?
Across the span of time it has been a common assumption that if you are a King then it was Gods will and thus all others must acknowledge the Kings authority.
E. Could You Also Be a Private Banker ?
Private Banker
See U.S. Code 31 5312
(a) In this subchapter— (1) “financial agency” means a person acting for a person (except for a country, a monetary or financial authority acting as a monetary or financial authority, or an international financial institution of which the United States Government is a member) as a financial institution, bailee, depository trustee, or agent, or acting in a similar way related to money, credit, securities, gold, or a transaction in money, credit, securities, or gold. (2) “financial institution” means—
(A) an insured bank (as defined in section 3(h) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813 (h)));
(B) a commercial bank or trust company;
(C) a private banker;
(D) an agency or branch of a foreign bank in the United States;
(E) any credit union;
(F) a thrift institution;
See U.S. Code 31 5312
(a) In this subchapter— (1) “financial agency” means a person acting for a person (except for a country, a monetary or financial authority acting as a monetary or financial authority, or an international financial institution of which the United States Government is a member) as a financial institution, bailee, depository trustee, or agent, or acting in a similar way related to money, credit, securities, gold, or a transaction in money, credit, securities, or gold. (2) “financial institution” means—
(A) an insured bank (as defined in section 3(h) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813 (h)));
(B) a commercial bank or trust company;
(C) a private banker;
(D) an agency or branch of a foreign bank in the United States;
(E) any credit union;
(F) a thrift institution;
The De jure are not subject to Code. However we use the codes to communicate certain concepts to our public servants. Here we can use USC 31 5312 to inform a de facto agent or court of our private banker Status.
F. Are You "As - King" or Are You Asking ?
G. The Chain of Command
"Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth."
Matthew 5:5
According to Merriam Webster Meek seems to be almost a bad thing.
Full Definition of MEEK
1 : enduring injury with patience and without resentment : mild
2 : deficient in spirit and courage : submissive
3 : not violent or strong : moderate
Who Are the Meek ?
Merriam Webster says that the word "Meek" didn't exist before the 13th century. Wasn't the book of Matthew written before that? If so, what was the word that was used before meek came along ?
Origin of MEEK Middle English, of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse mjūkr gentle; akin to Welsh esmwyth soft First Known Use: 13th century
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meek
Matthew 5:5
According to Merriam Webster Meek seems to be almost a bad thing.
Full Definition of MEEK
1 : enduring injury with patience and without resentment : mild
2 : deficient in spirit and courage : submissive
3 : not violent or strong : moderate
Who Are the Meek ?
Merriam Webster says that the word "Meek" didn't exist before the 13th century. Wasn't the book of Matthew written before that? If so, what was the word that was used before meek came along ?
Origin of MEEK Middle English, of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse mjūkr gentle; akin to Welsh esmwyth soft First Known Use: 13th century
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meek
What is their Status and Standing ?
The Judge... is not a Judge. They want to be and they will do everything to convince you tyhat they are. But here are the facts on their true Standing.
There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
The Judge... is not a Judge. They want to be and they will do everything to convince you tyhat they are. But here are the facts on their true Standing.
There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
Who is your Opposition ?
Judges are not Judges. They use presumption against us. It's time to use it on them. Don't presume they are Judges. Why ? Because they are not.
There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
Judges are simply Administrators. That's right. So the next time you are being threatened... think about asking the Administrator this...
1. "Will you be enforcing statutes and codes here today?"
2. "Do Judges enforce Statutes and Codes ?"
3. "I thought only Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes?"
4. "Are you an Administrator or a Judge ?"
Answer 1 - By this time... the Administrator will be getting hot.
Answer 2- If you are in a court that is not corrupt, these questions will help level the playing field.
If you are in a corrupt court... see answer 1
Now... ask yourself this, how can you be in a court if there is no judge ?
Answer - You can't be.
What if the administrator threatens you with contempt? How can there be contempt when there isn't even a court ?
Do you see how Status and Standing is the key to unraveling the whole fraudulent game ?
Judges are not Judges. They use presumption against us. It's time to use it on them. Don't presume they are Judges. Why ? Because they are not.
There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
Judges are simply Administrators. That's right. So the next time you are being threatened... think about asking the Administrator this...
1. "Will you be enforcing statutes and codes here today?"
2. "Do Judges enforce Statutes and Codes ?"
3. "I thought only Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes?"
4. "Are you an Administrator or a Judge ?"
Answer 1 - By this time... the Administrator will be getting hot.
Answer 2- If you are in a court that is not corrupt, these questions will help level the playing field.
If you are in a corrupt court... see answer 1
Now... ask yourself this, how can you be in a court if there is no judge ?
Answer - You can't be.
What if the administrator threatens you with contempt? How can there be contempt when there isn't even a court ?
Do you see how Status and Standing is the key to unraveling the whole fraudulent game ?